You are currently viewing the monthly archive for October 2005.

Industrial relations campaign update

The Government will introduce its industrial relations legislation to parliament tomorrow. Surely Kevin Andrews, a devout Catholic, couldn’t have missed the significance of on All Souls’ Day, which commemorates the faithful departed? It certainly resonates with a report that says WorkChoices will shorten the lives of low-income workers. The study cited evidence from New Zealand [...]

Continue reading...

· 31 October 2005 · 11:48 pm · 0 comments

Industrial relations campaign update

The High Court delivered its reasons for approving the WorkChoices propaganda campaign. My initial assessment was that the majority have rendered the Senate’s budget scrutiny impotent; Kenneth Davidson agrees: “As important as the political advertising case was, it pales into insignificance compared with the violence the majority decision has done to the institution of Parliament [...]

Continue reading...

· 27 October 2005 · 12:05 am · 0 comments

Industrial relations campaign update

The Government’s advertising campaign has been ineffective so far. A Morgan poll says only 1% more people have heard of the IR proposals since the WorkChoices campaign began. 49% of respondents opposed the package, with a measly 17% in support. In particular, the WorkChoices hotline has been a spectacular failure. The operators are worried about [...]

Continue reading...

· 18 October 2005 · 11:16 pm · 0 comments

Industrial relations campaign update

This is a big one… Because the Government hadn’t finished drafting the legislation but wanted to press ahead with its propaganda campaign, it was forced to relaunch its industrial relations policy. Business leaders were summoned to Canberra to be given a special “lock-up” briefing about the package. Apparently, “One invitee isn’t coming because, among other [...]

Continue reading...

· 14 October 2005 · 11:14 am · 0 comments

Industrial relations campaign update

The ACTU’s legal challenge to the Government’s IR propaganda was rejected by the High Court, apparently on a technicality. In a brief media statement (pdf), the Court said it was “not appropriate to answer” whether the Government’s spending was properly authorised. At this stage, it is not possible to say why the claim was rejected, [...]

Continue reading...

· 2 October 2005 · 9:47 pm · 0 comments